The entire camera has grown a little bit compared to the X-T3. The silver finish is the same as the one found on the X-T2 and X-T3. The material used is magnesium alloy which has been coated in either a black or a silver finish. Before anybody get their “hatin’ on”, let’s just put all the “cheap Chinese products” bullshit to rest, shall we? The quality of the build is very good, and there’s no feeling of cheap build anywhere! Just like the X-T3 before it, the X-T4 has been assembled in China. It comes in both silver and black from the get-go.
The X-T1 had to be purchased as a special edition graphite silver model, whereas the X-T2 and X-T3 came in silver editions right off the bat. I personally LOVE how it looks in the silver variant.
BRONICA RF645 SPECS MANUAL
Drawing obvious design cues from the old Contax RTS cameras, the X-T series looking very balanced with its bilateral top dials, the beefy faux-mirror-box EVF top and the focus on manual controls.
There’s no denying that the X-T series has always been one of the more well-designed faux-dslr style mirrorless cameras. That is the HUGE benefit of not being a proper reviewer, and doing this writeup out of passion alone.īut let’s dive on in to the nitty gritty shall we….
BRONICA RF645 SPECS FULL
So for full spec runthroughs and comparison head-to-head tests etc you will have to look somewhere else. I’d rather outline the key differences, and what I like and what I dislike. The entire camera with full specs, packshots from every imaginable angle and comparison charts have already leaked within the past two weeks, so I’m thinking that I won’t get into too many specifics in this “first look preview”. Great looking combo, the XT4 & XF56mm f/1.2 What started out as an experiment has since become Fujifilms top selling mirrorless APSC camera. And ever since then the X-T2 and recently the VERY capable and critically acclaimed X-T3 have all made a very big mark in the mirrorless camera market. I know that it completely saved the X-series back with the (to Fujifilm even) surprising popularity of the X-T1. So I have never taken a particular keen interest in the DSLR shaped X-T series. (Be they real film rangefinders like the Bronica RF645, The Fujifilm T-X1, The Leica M series or the Fujifilm GW690, or be they pseudo-rangefinders like the X-Pro series, the X100 series or even the Contax G series.) I comes as no surprise to those of you who have been following my journey over the past 8 years that I am a photographer who likes his cameras in the shape of a rangefinder. Image quality might therefore not be final, although I have been told that it is.ĭisclaimer 3: All shots with- and of the product has been shot by me, and is not to be used without my explicit permission. I expect you to be adults, capable of forming your own opinions based on presented information.ĭisclaimer 2: All the images in this article has been shot using a prototype of the X-T4 camera. This means that I’m just about as biased as I can get, and whether you choose to believe my views or not is entirely up to you. I don’t get paid for doing these write ups (and I have been doing them even before getting involved with Fujifilm). That’s spelled brand ambassador for Fujifilm.
BRONICA RF645 SPECS FREE
Feel free to skip everything but number 3ĭisclaimer 1: I’m an X-photographer.
0 kommentar(er)
